Abstract
Real-world
effectiveness data is needed to inform hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment
decisions. The uptake of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (LDV/SOF) regimens
across healthcare settings has been rapid but variations often occur in
clinical practice. The aim of this study was to assess sustained
virologic response (SVR) of LDV/SOF±ribavirin (RBV) in routine medical
practice. This observational, intent-to-treat cohort was comprised of
4365 genotype 1 treatment-naïve HCV-infected veterans treated with
LDV/SOF±RBV. SVR rates were 91.3% (3191/3495) for LDV/SOF and 92.0%
(527/573) for LDV/SOF+RBV (p=0.65). African American race (OR 0.70,
95%CI 0.54-0.90, p0.004) and FIB-4 >3.25 (OR 0.56, 95%CI 0.43-0.71,
p<0.001) were independently associated with decreased likelihood of
SVR; age, sex, BMI, decompensated liver disease, diabetes, genotype 1
subtype and regimen did not predict SVR. In models limited to those who
completed 12 weeks of treatment, African American race was no longer a
significant predictor of SVR but FIB-4 >3.25 (OR 0.35, 95%CI
0.24-0.50, p<0.001) remained. Among non-cirrhotics (defined by
FIB-4≤3.25) with baseline HCV RNA<6,000,000 IU/ml, SVR rates were
93.2% (1020/1094) for those who completed 8 weeks of therapy and 96.6%
(875/906) for those who completed 12 weeks of therapy (p=0.001). Conclusions:
In this real-world cohort, SVR rates with LDV/SOF±RBV nearly matched
the rates reported in clinical trials and were consistently high across
all subgroups. Non-cirrhotics with HCV RNA<6,000,000 IU/mL were less
likely to achieve SVR with 8 weeks compared to 12 weeks of therapy
although the numeric difference in SVR rates was small.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.